| Skip to content Social Security Online |
Hearings and Appeals | |
| Public Use Files | Public Use Files |
|
Available Data Files
|
Hearing Office Dispositions Per ALJ Per Day Rate Ranking ReportFY 2013 (For Reporting Purposes: 09/29/2012 Through 04/26/2013)A ranking of the 165 ODAR hearing offices (including 3 satellite offices) by the average number of hearings dispositions per ALJ per day. The average shown will be a combined average for all ALJs working in that hearing office. Users will be able determine where a particular hearing office stands among the total with respect to this workload category. National Ranking Report
|
| Rank | Hearing Office | Region | ALJ Dispositions Per Day Per ALJ |
|---|---|---|---|
1 |
RIO GRANDE VALLEY TX * | 06 |
3.15 |
2 |
KINGSPORT | 04 |
3.06 |
3 |
PONCE | 02 |
2.99 |
4 |
WILKES BARRE | 03 |
2.97 |
5 |
PADUCAH | 04 |
2.80 |
6 |
FARGO | 08 |
2.75 |
7 |
LOS ANGELES DOWNTOWN | 09 |
2.74 |
8 |
MCALESTER | 06 |
2.72 |
8 |
WASHINGTON | 03 |
2.72 |
10 |
HATTIESBURG | 04 |
2.71 |
11 |
MONTGOMERY | 04 |
2.69 |
12 |
COLORADO SPRINGS | 08 |
2.64 |
12 |
ANCHORAGE AK | 10 |
2.64 |
14 |
HONOLULU | 09 |
2.63 |
15 |
LEXINGTON | 04 |
2.62 |
16 |
PROVIDENCE | 01 |
2.60 |
17 |
FORT WORTH | 06 |
2.58 |
18 |
SPRINGFIELD MA | 01 |
2.57 |
19 |
MIDDLESBORO | 04 |
2.55 |
19 |
MEMPHIS | 04 |
2.55 |
19 |
MT PLEASANT MI | 05 |
2.55 |
22 |
HOUSTON NORTH | 06 |
2.54 |
22 |
TUCSON | 09 |
2.54 |
22 |
SPOKANE | 10 |
2.54 |
25 |
ST LOUIS | 07 |
2.53 |
26 |
LAWRENCE MA | 01 |
2.52 |
26 |
PHILADELPHIA EAST | 03 |
2.52 |
26 |
NEW YORK | 02 |
2.52 |
29 |
SAN JUAN | 02 |
2.51 |
29 |
COLUMBIA SC | 04 |
2.51 |
29 |
TULSA | 06 |
2.51 |
32 |
RENO NV | 09 |
2.49 |
32 |
HARRISBURG | 03 |
2.49 |
32 |
RALEIGH | 04 |
2.49 |
35 |
JOHNSTOWN | 03 |
2.48 |
35 |
HOUSTON-BISSONNET | 06 |
2.48 |
35 |
OMAHA | 07 |
2.48 |
35 |
FORT SMITH | 06 |
2.48 |
39 |
DALLAS DOWNTOWN | 06 |
2.47 |
39 |
LONG BEACH | 09 |
2.47 |
41 |
MINNEAPOLIS | 05 |
2.44 |
42 |
AUGUSTA GA | 04 |
2.43 |
42 |
CHATTANOOGA | 04 |
2.43 |
42 |
BALTIMORE | 03 |
2.43 |
42 |
MANCHESTER | 01 |
2.43 |
46 |
PORTLAND ME | 01 |
2.42 |
46 |
FRANKLIN TN | 04 |
2.42 |
46 |
RICHMOND | 03 |
2.42 |
46 |
LANSING | 05 |
2.42 |
46 |
CREVE COEUR | 07 |
2.42 |
51 |
DALLAS NORTH | 06 |
2.41 |
51 |
VALPARAISO IN | 05 |
2.41 |
51 |
FT LAUDERDALE | 04 |
2.41 |
51 |
ATLANTA NORTH | 04 |
2.41 |
51 |
PORTLAND OR | 10 |
2.41 |
56 |
GREENVILLE | 04 |
2.40 |
57 |
ATLANTA DOWNTOWN | 04 |
2.39 |
57 |
CHARLESTON WV | 03 |
2.39 |
57 |
HARTFORD | 01 |
2.39 |
57 |
JERICHO | 02 |
2.39 |
57 |
TOLEDO OH | 05 |
2.39 |
57 |
CHARLESTON SC | 04 |
2.39 |
63 |
MOBILE | 04 |
2.38 |
63 |
LITTLE ROCK | 06 |
2.38 |
63 |
COLUMBIA MO | 07 |
2.38 |
63 |
BRONX | 02 |
2.38 |
67 |
LOUISVILLE | 04 |
2.37 |
67 |
WICHITA | 07 |
2.37 |
67 |
STOCKTON | 09 |
2.37 |
67 |
METAIRIE | 06 |
2.37 |
71 |
AKRON OH | 05 |
2.36 |
71 |
ALEXANDRIA | 06 |
2.36 |
71 |
PITTSBURGH | 03 |
2.36 |
71 |
BOSTON | 01 |
2.36 |
75 |
HUNTINGTON | 03 |
2.35 |
76 |
ST PETERSBURG FL | 04 |
2.34 |
76 |
SAN ANTONIO | 06 |
2.34 |
76 |
ORLANDO | 04 |
2.34 |
76 |
ORANGE | 09 |
2.34 |
80 |
SAN JOSE | 09 |
2.33 |
80 |
ALBUQUERQUE | 06 |
2.33 |
80 |
FLINT | 05 |
2.33 |
83 |
JACKSON | 04 |
2.32 |
83 |
KNOXVILLE | 04 |
2.32 |
83 |
SEVEN FIELDS | 03 |
2.32 |
83 |
NORFOLK | 03 |
2.32 |
87 |
ALBANY | 02 |
2.31 |
87 |
SAN BERNARDINO | 09 |
2.31 |
87 |
BILLINGS | 08 |
2.31 |
90 |
MORENO VALLEY CA | 09 |
2.30 |
90 |
MORGANTOWN | 03 |
2.30 |
92 |
FLORENCE | 04 |
2.29 |
92 |
DENVER | 08 |
2.29 |
92 |
GRAND RAPIDS | 05 |
2.29 |
95 |
TUPELO | 04 |
2.28 |
95 |
CHARLOTTE | 04 |
2.28 |
95 |
ROCHESTER * | 02 |
2.28 |
95 |
SACRAMENTO | 09 |
2.28 |
99 |
NEW HAVEN | 01 |
2.27 |
100 |
ELKINS PARK | 03 |
2.26 |
100 |
NASHVILLE | 04 |
2.26 |
102 |
LIVONIA MI | 05 |
2.25 |
102 |
TOPEKA KS | 07 |
2.25 |
104 |
DETROIT | 05 |
2.24 |
104 |
FORT WAYNE | 05 |
2.24 |
106 |
SAVANNAH | 04 |
2.21 |
106 |
BIRMINGHAM | 04 |
2.21 |
106 |
SANTA BARBARA | 09 |
2.21 |
109 |
OAK PARK | 05 |
2.20 |
110 |
NEWARK | 02 |
2.18 |
111 |
COVINGTON GA | 04 |
2.17 |
111 |
EVANSVILLE | 05 |
2.17 |
111 |
PHOENIX | 09 |
2.17 |
111 |
SAN RAFAEL | 09 |
2.17 |
115 |
PEORIA | 05 |
2.16 |
115 |
DAYTON | 05 |
2.16 |
117 |
ROANOKE | 03 |
2.15 |
118 |
JACKSONVILLE | 04 |
2.14 |
118 |
LAS VEGAS | 09 |
2.14 |
120 |
NEW ORLEANS | 06 |
2.13 |
120 |
LOS ANGELES WEST | 09 |
2.13 |
122 |
MADISON | 05 |
2.12 |
122 |
OAK BROOK | 05 |
2.12 |
122 |
TAMPA | 04 |
2.12 |
122 |
MAYAGUEZ | 02 |
2.12 |
126 |
TALLAHASSEE FL | 04 |
2.11 |
126 |
SHREVEPORT | 06 |
2.11 |
128 |
PHOENIX NORTH | 09 |
2.10 |
129 |
SOUTH JERSEY | 02 |
2.09 |
130 |
ORLAND PARK | 05 |
2.08 |
131 |
SALT LAKE CITY | 08 |
2.07 |
131 |
JERSEY CITY | 02 |
2.07 |
131 |
EUGENE | 10 |
2.07 |
134 |
TACOMA WA | 10 |
2.06 |
134 |
OKLAHOMA CITY | 06 |
2.06 |
136 |
INDIANAPOLIS | 05 |
2.05 |
136 |
COLUMBUS | 05 |
2.05 |
136 |
FAYETTEVILLE NC | 04 |
2.05 |
139 |
SAN FRANCISCO | 09 |
2.04 |
140 |
EVANSTON | 05 |
2.03 |
140 |
WEST DES MOINES | 07 |
2.03 |
142 |
DOVER | 03 |
2.02 |
143 |
SYRACUSE | 02 |
2.01 |
143 |
GREENSBORO | 04 |
2.01 |
145 |
KANSAS CITY | 07 |
1.99 |
145 |
FRESNO | 09 |
1.99 |
147 |
SPRINGFIELD MO | 07 |
1.98 |
147 |
SEATTLE | 10 |
1.98 |
149 |
WHITE PLAINS | 02 |
1.97 |
150 |
CHARLOTTESVILLE | 03 |
1.94 |
150 |
MILWAUKEE | 05 |
1.94 |
152 |
PHILADELPHIA | 03 |
1.87 |
152 |
NORWALK | 09 |
1.87 |
154 |
MACON | 04 |
1.86 |
154 |
CINCINNATI | 05 |
1.86 |
156 |
BROOKLYN | 02 |
1.83 |
157 |
FORT MYERS FL * | 04 |
1.80 |
157 |
PASADENA | 09 |
1.80 |
159 |
MIAMI | 04 |
1.79 |
160 |
OAKLAND | 09 |
1.73 |
161 |
SAN DIEGO | 09 |
1.71 |
162 |
CLEVELAND | 05 |
1.70 |
163 |
BUFFALO | 02 |
1.64 |
164 |
CHICAGO | 05 |
1.54 |
165 |
QUEENS | 02 |
1.51 |
Disclaimer: These data are being made publicly available for research purposes. Any findings and conclusions derived from analyses of these data are attributable to the researcher(s) and do not reflect those of the Social Security Administration.
| |
Privacy Policy | Website
Policies & Other Important Information | Site
Map
Last reviewed or modified Wednesday May 15, 2013 |